Bangladesh faces the challenge of navigating a future that upholds the democratic aspirations championed by its young student protesters while also fostering the stability essential for the nation’s ongoing economic and political turmoil. Former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s troubles began when a group of young student protesters called for the abolition of the unjust quota system that favored the relatives of her political allies in the allocation of civil service jobs. What could have been easily settled with a simple straightforward promise of reform was exacerbated by her insensitive remarks and stubbornness followed by a deadly crackdown of her security forces. This reaction of hers to the protests ultimately led to her downfall. She sealed her fate when she decided to crack down rather than pursue dialogue with student protesters. That being said, the protesters this time ended up achieving what political adversaries of Hasina had unsuccessfully tried to accomplish for over a decade. While the young activists and their supporters have much to celebrate, the path ahead for the country is filled with challenges and tribulations.

Hasina’s reputation as the so called “Iron Lady” has been fully dismantled after being seen to flee the country in the face of mass demonstrations. She was driven away by thousands of unarmed youth protesters, despite her forces carrying weapons and firing all out barbarically. This humiliating scene of her departure makes any future political comeback of hers highly unlikely in Bangladesh’s future political landscape. It remains uncertain if the Awami League can continue to be a powerful influence in Bangladeshi politics, but whatever its future holds, it is with certainty that it will be without Hasina. There is a sense of excitement and hope for a brighter future throughout the country as a whole, but that optimism should be seen with caution. Bangladesh throughout its short history has been prone to significant political upheaval, economic challenges and military interventions that surface during extended periods of unrest and instability.

The recent movement’s success in creating a more equal, free and democratic Bangladesh will rely on the practical implementation of the student’s demands. Additionally, it will depend on the new interim administration, led by veteran Nobel Peace Prize winning economist Muhammad Yunus’s ability to handle these challenges while ensuring all stakeholders are on board. The objective is not just to hold fair elections; it is to redesign the governance institutions to prevent them from ever being so completely dominated by those in positions of political power. The political institutions of Bangladesh have become weakened. Key institutions such as the Election Commission, Civil Service, Police, Judiciary and even the Military suffer from a lack of public trust due to their complicity with Hasina’s regime all these years. The caretaker government system that facilitated peaceful power transitions in the past is no longer viable. The focal challenge for the new government at the helm will be in finding a balance between the need for institutional reform and the necessity of conducting new elections.

The sudden withdrawal of the Awami League has created a significant void in the political landscape, which the reform-oriented student leaders lack the experience to fill. While free and fair elections are crucial for bringing in an elected government with the peoples mandate, which represents merely one aspect of a fully functioning democracy. Moving ahead too quickly into elections could inadvertently in a way give space to tried and tested political parties, such as the Islamist Jamaat Islami and the Nationalist BNP, who have little motivation to pursue necessary structural reforms. The Yunus government must approach the timing and implementation of institutional reforms, the rebuilding of public trust in institutions and the scheduling of elections with patience and above all careful planning, all the while grappling with a economy that is faltering by each passing day. Achieving the right balance is essential for restoring political stability and moving towards complete democratic governance so that any one actor is not able to take advantage of this delicate situation at hand.

The Yunus-led interim setup now has the opening to realign and move ahead with a foreign policy that benefits Bangladesh as a whole, rather than catering to any individual or political segment as was the case with Hasina. If Geography is anything to go by, India will continue to be Bangladesh’s most important regional relationship. The economic significance of India to Bangladesh is likely to hinder substantial shifts in its foreign policy, regardless of the current anti-India sentiment in Bangladesh at the moment. India has made both strategic and financial investments in Bangladesh, making it challenging for any future government to pivot away from India easily. Unlike India, China may find it easier to establish a relationship with any new government, but a stumbling block for that can come in the form of a resurgent political opposition that frequently criticized Hasina for being too compliant with both India and China. Western nations will be undoubtedly cautious of China’s efforts to influence Bangladesh’s evolving political situation. Today the United States enjoys considerable popularity among Bangladesh’s young populace and emerging political leaders, presenting an opportunity to build strong relations with any future administration. That being said, Yunus will probably aim to avoid over-dependence on Western nations and will also look cultivate relations in its own region with countries such as Pakistan and Afghanistan where previous inroads weren’t made. The challenge lies in charting a course that upholds the democratic ideals advocated by youth protesters while also ensuring the stability essential for Bangladesh’s ongoing political and economic growth.

Word Limit: 921